N/A
Overall health index cannot be calculated due to missing component data.
Note: One or more underlying data components are missing, preventing calculation of some health factors and the overall index.
Measures stability vs. a dynamic baseline and an ideal balance. (0=max deviation, 100=perfect stability)
Composite of deck and card pool diversity (0 = min. diversity, 100 = max. diversity).
Measures the trend in event participation. High scores reflect stability or growth, while low scores indicate a decline.
Measures the trend in player engagement. High scores reflect stability or growth, while low scores indicate a decline.
How strongly few decks dominate (0 = max. dominance, 100 = max. diversity of top decks). N/A if data is insufficient.
Economic health based on card demand and affordability. This is a 50/50 simple average of the two sub-factors.
AI-based sentiment score of the latest B&R announcement's impact on format health.
| Super-Archetype | 5-Year Avg. | 90-day Baseline | Current | Deviation (5y/90d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AGGRO | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0%/0.0% |
| CONTROL | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0%/0.0% |
| COMBO | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0%/0.0% |
N/A
This score is a weighted average reflecting metagame stability. It combines similarity to the dynamic baseline (40% weight), the historical 5-year average (40% weight), and a theoretically balanced metagame (20% weight).
100.0 / 100
Measures how similar the current archetype balance is to the stable 5-year average.
100.0 / 100
Measures how similar the current archetype balance is to the dynamic 90d baseline.
0.0 / 100
Measures how similar the current balance is to a conceptual one-third split between archetypes.
Diversity data is not available.
No chart data available for monthly event counts.
61.0 / 100
Average Monthly Growth Rate: -2.3%.Event Counts changed from 38 (May 2025) to 33 (Nov 2025), a -13.2% shift over 6 months.
Not enough data to display player volume chart.
81.5 / 100
This is the final score contributing to the overall Health Index. It's an average of the available platform scores below.
95.5 / 100
Average Monthly Growth: 8.4%.Player counts changed from 121 (May 2025) to 196 (Nov 2025), a +62.0% shift over 6 months.
67.4 / 100
Average Monthly Growth: -1.6%.Player counts changed from 789 (May 2025) to 715 (Nov 2025), a -9.4% shift over 6 months.
| Rank | Deck Name | Months at #1 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Esper Lurrus | 6 |
| 2 | Paradoxical Outcome | 2 |
| 3 | Azorius Tempo | 1 |
| Rank | Deck Name | Months at #1 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Paradoxical Outcome | 5 |
| 2 | Dimir Control | 2 |
| 3 | Coveted Jewel | 1 |
72.9 / 100
This is the final score contributing to the overall Health Index. It's an average of the available platform scores below.
69.4 / 100
Most dominant deck (last 12 mo): Esper Lurrus (6 mo. at #1).
76.4 / 100
Most dominant deck (last 12 mo): Paradoxical Outcome (5 mo. at #1).
Not enough data to display price trend chart.
N/A
This is the final score. It's an average of the demand and affordability scores below.
12.4 / 100
Measures price basket trends. Stability or growth is healthy; decline is heavily penalized.
N/A / 100
Benchmarks format price against the most affordable MtG formats.
No card status changes were announced for this format.
The decision to hold off on banning Lurrus indicates a belief in the format's self-correcting ability and anticipation for new cards to shake up the metagame; the format appears to be in a wait-and-see pattern.
65.0 / 100
This score reflects the AI's sentiment on the future health of the format based on the announcement. 1 = Very Negative, 50 = Neutral, 100 = Very Positive.